COURT DATES AND LOCATION
Posted by truthteller at 10/3/2007 7:52 AM and is filed under uncategorized 
Post all court dates here. Also post which courts the appearance is, i.e. Middlesex, Concord, Worcester, etc.....
I encourage people to show up, even if you are not involved in that particular case.
I encourage people to show up, even if you are not involved in that particular case.
I believe we all need to stick together. So I encourage anyone who can show up at a court date to do so. I will be attending some, but I'm not saying which ones.
Paul McMann and David Green can play "Who's John Doe?"
Am I that one? Or that one? Or that one over there?
Reply to this
We have a depositino of John Ruggeiri on Thursday of this coming week. We tried to do it yesterday (Friday) but his attorney said he "was not available" Couldn't get any alternative dates from his attorney and finally his attorney tried to get a protective order. In that hearing, we finally got a new deposition date of Thursday of this coming week. John Ruggeiri is the attorney who took title to several Paul McMann proprties in trust and then financed them with large mortgages.
Reply to this
Trial scheduled in Middlesex Superior Court on November 7, 2007 in the matter of Colony v. McMann (MICV2006-02341. attachment approved for $50,000.00 at the beginning of the case. Final pretrial on October 31, 2007. Jury waived.
Reply to this
Hearing before the Appeals Court on November l5th in the matter of McMann v. MacGowan. Another failed "development agreement".
Also had the deposition of John Ruggeiri in the matter of Cabe contractng v. McMann today.
Reply to this
I am pretty sure my court date is the 16th not the 15th. When I got the letter from my lawyer, the date became imbedded in my brain . I have been waiting so long for just this appeal to get heard. Cannot wait to get my trial date. Can we have a party after this devil finally gets what he deserves? The man is so brilliant, I don't understand why he didn't use his brains in a respectable way, he would have been so successful.
Reply to this
Injunction hearing scheduled on Tuesday October 16th at Middlesex Court in Cambridge - Courtroom 9B at 2PM.
Paul and his lawyer are trying to get the website shutdown.
Reply to this
TT:
Due to work and work only, and the fact that I need too, I can't attend a hearing in favor of the website.
Otherwise I would, and I assure you of that.
I have a question for Margaret regarding her posting on the other blog, regarding the fact that PM did not spend any time in jail for a criminal offense.
I did not think that we had "debtors prisons" in the US. Even OJ Simpson has walked for 10 years on an extremely high judgement, and high profile.
I am curious as to why PM would have been sentenced to any jail time in failure to pay on his judgements? Is that (and I ask out of ignorance, not knowledge) because he had money to pay, but chose not too? Does a guy like OJ roam free because he has no money, at least in the form of "provable money"? I am confused. And it is not your job to answer that, but I guess the law can be confusing and for those of us trying to do the right thing I personally need some sort of clarification, if you can.
Thanks Margaret, and Artie, TT, et all others. And good luck tomorrow, etc, etc, etc.
Reply to this
Middlesex Courthouse
40 Thorndyke Street
Cambridge MA
Courtroom 9B at 2PM
Reply to this
What a wonderful day. I had the humble experience of watching PM lose another Court case. Apparently PM & David Green don't like to see me. David pointed out to the Judge several times that I was in the Court Room. The Judge pointed out that it is a public arena.
My opinion of what happened - PM's Lawyer got easily beat by people without a Lawyer. It appeared to me that these people were better Lawyers than the "real" Lawyer was. With what I saw today, I hope PM doesn't pay his Lawyer more than $15 per hour. And how can David Green keep saying things that are not true. He stated that Gloria Cole accused him(PM) of starting the fire - hmmmm, and I thought she may of said that it appeared suspicious? Oh - and that it may not be true that PM doesn't owe people / contractors. I wonder what he calls all those Judgments against PM? PM and David really belong togeather. Wonder if David ever had to wait to get paid by PM? An interesting thought, PM's accountant complained about not getting paid, did he quit or is he still there. Unconfirmed - heard that PM's current roofer/gutter guy has not been paid for awhile now, why would he ever keep working for PM?
From what I heard, PM has another Court Case involving 10's of thousands of dollars. The date is 11/9/07 at the Cambridge Court house. Please correct me if I am wrong? I urge all that have cases against PM to show up. Personally it feels good to see PM & David squirm and there is power in numbers. I assure you with what I saw today, there is nothing to fear about PM anymore. He is being hit every which way and he is on his way out. I wonder if PM should hire a better Lawyer?
To the person called Paulsux - today seeing PM lose a case was a much better feeling than any fight that I ever fought. Having his Lawyer complain about me being there was sweet. On the same token, I would never back down from him. He sued me after bouncing checks to me and I will not back down here until it is over. I just wanted to be done with him and he came after me. I have a very qualified Lawyer and I have no fear at all. On that note, we hope to have attachments on the Dorchester property this week.
Reply to this
We do not have debtor's prison - you are right. However, after the court has made an order (like an order to pay) and there is no compliance with the order - and there is no excuse or justification - the court can hold the person in contempt for refusal to comply with the order. In this case, Paul McMann (according to the docket of the case) defaulted in the original case and a determination was made that he owed the amount claimed. The order in the small claims judgment usually contains a separate order to pay in 30 days. Then there is a compliance hearing to see whether the judgment has been paid. According to the docket, Paul McMann again defaulted. A capias issued to secure his attendance at court. He was (accoridng to the docket) brought in under the capias. I understand that there was a hearing to determine whether there was any excuse for his non-payment. The judge was aware that he had purchased a house in Weston for over a million dollars. Based on all that the judge heard, the judge found him in contempt of the order to pay the judgment in full. The sentence was for the contempt. I understand - and the docket shows this - that he was taken to the Cambridge Jail, which is the top few floors of the Middlesex Superior Court House in Cambridge. He spent the night and the next day was brought over to the Somerville Court. When we had the deposition of his attorney, John Ruggieri, the attorney stated that Paul McMann had called him from the jail (actually he said from the Middlesex Superior Court, but we know it was the jail on top of the Middlesex Superior Court House), askesd him to bring enough money to pay the judgment. The attorney did - he said it was his own money that he was lending to PM - and the judge let Paul McMann go. Because he had purged himself of the contempt of court in failing or refusing to pay the judgment. A long time ago, we did have debtor's prison, but it has been outlawed for a long time now. But we still do have contempt of court. It is unusual, but it does happen.
Reply to this
Paul McMann has filed a new case against some neighbors on Summer Street in Weston. Case is characterized as "miscellaneous contract". Case was filed by David Green the same day as the hearing on the web site.
Reply to this
The Benji MacGowan case is scheduled to be heard on Friday, November l6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. at the John Adams court house in Boston in Pemberton Square
Sorry about the mistake in the date!
Reply to this
Keeper of records depositino of First Commonwealth Group scheduled for Monday, October 22 in the matter of O'Sullivan Architects v. First Commonwealth Group. Just received notice that Paul McMann is still "looking for records" and is "not available" on Monday.
Reply to this
New case filed Thursday: O'Sullivan Architects v. Paul McMann, Eileen McMann, John G. Ruggieri, First Commonwealth Group, Inc., First Commonwealth Ventures, Inc. and Looney & Grossman LLP. O'Sullivan Architects has had a judgment against First Commonwealth Group, Inc. for some time and nothing has been paid. Case is asking for a receiver as two demands for payment were made on the execution and nothing was paid. Also asking for a turnover of equipment in the name of First Commonwealth Group. Also asking for reach and apply against Paul McMann, Eileen McMann, John Ruggieri. Also alleging 93A violations against all defendants for the scheme whereby Paul McMann's property would be placed in a trust in the name of John G. Ruggieri, Paul McMann's attorney and partner at Looney & Grossman. Testimony at John Ruggieri's deposition revealed that he doesn't know where the properties are, doesn't know what they are and doesn't collect any rent. Hasn't filed any tax returns for the rent or kept any financial records. Also has a separate agreement with Paul McMann, drafted by Looney & Grossman providing that Paul McMann would retain control over all these properties and John Ruggieri would simply hold title and perform "ministerial" acts. Attachment approved for $85,000.00.
Reply to this
Rogers Insulation Specialists v. Paul McMann, Eileen McMann, David Green.
Attachment approved in Middlesex Superior Court against properties in Middlesex and Suffolk County
Reply to this
Bhargava and Henderson v. Paul McMann, First Commonwealth Group and First Commonwealth Ventures. Somerville District Court. Attachment approved in the amount of $20,000.00. (I believe this case relates to a sale of a condominium in Somerville where there were serious construction flaws, including the construction of the foundation. Case states that it relates to a warranty.)
Reply to this
Satiroglu v. McMann, Suffolk Superior Court Docket No. 2007-04156
Attachment hearing on for November 6, 2007 2pm; motion filed with no opposition.
Reply to this
New trial date on the Pam Colony case agaisnt Paul McMann: November 28, 2007. Supposed to be November 7th but changed by the court.
Reply to this
Rogers Insulation v. Paul McMann et als
Middlesex Superior Court.
Judge denied motion of Paul and Eileen McMann to dissolve the real estate attachments, particularly those against
Warner Street Dorchester property.
O'Sullivan Architects v. McMann et als
Paul and Eileen McMann moved to dissolve real estate attachments. Judge suggested that the $85,000.00 be placed in an escrow account.
Reply to this
Judgment entered in the case of Cabe Contracting v. Paul McMann in the Concord District Court. Judge awarded full contract damages, interst, costs and $13,000.00 in attorneys fees pursuant to the 93A claim.
Reply to this
First time visitor to this blog. I Have information linked Paul McMann, Eileen McMann and John Ruggieri that could prove usefull in prosecuting this case. Mr. Ruggieri has been involved in a number of fraudulent legal transactions and TAX evasion scams as well as fraudulent title exchanges. Please post an email for a response....
Reply to this
Can you contact the administrator of this board to contact Margaret Melican, the attorney who is handling quite a few of the Paul McMann cases? Thanks! Her email address and phone number were up here but may have been taken down. The administrator of this board has all contact information...
Reply to this
To AKA,
Contact emails are:
webmaster@paulmcmann.com
or
Mattafam@msn.com
or
MargaretMelicanM@aol.com
All are checked frequently
Reply to this
Dear AKA,
Please contact me relative to your information regarding fraudulent trusts etc. If you are close to any of these people, I would use another computer (library e.g.) so it can't be tracked back to you. We understand that they have a private investigator who specializes in computers. I can tell you more if you call me or write to me via email.
Reply to this
Pamela Colony case scheduled for trial on January 7, 2007 jury waived in Middlesex Superior Court 9:00 a.m. Case has been rescheduled a couple of times already. Attachment for $50K. This case relates to the sale of the Concord Property (389 Old bedford Road) I believe as she appears in the chain of title.
Reply to this
In the case of First Commonwealth Ventures v. Arthur Desrosiers, the Court had entered a restraining order againsts Paul McMann taking any of the rent money from the properties conveyed to John Ruggieri. A few months later, PM filed a motion to let him use the rent money to pay mortgages etc. He said at that time (August or September) that the mortgages were 90 days past due. The court entered an order permitting him to pay real estate expenses only if he gave me notice wihtin 24 hours. He could only pay past due expenses, not in advance. I have never gotten any notice that he paid anything and I have asked his attorney many times about any payments. Finally, I requested reconsideration of the order. Got this in the mail today regarding the motion for reconsideration:
MOTION (P#27.0) Court will reconsider on 1/15/08 at 2:00 p.m. and
2 will also consider sanctions including legal fees, costs and
3 limitation on evidence (John P. Connor, Jr. Associate Justice). dated
4 12/27/07. Notices mailed 12/28/2007
Reply to this
Here is the new case info: McMann v Litton Servicing Corporation, Case No. MICV2008-00371 for miscellaneous equitable remedy. I am sure it has something to do with stoping the sales of the properties.
Reply to this
Big new case against Paul McMann from the woman in concord whose case was heard recently in the Middlesex Superior Court. He owed her $50K, the judge gave her $100K and invited her attorney to submit attorneys fees. That woman is going going after him tooth and nail.
Reply to this